1. The USA, as always, have got to an authoritarianism trap – to replace gone too far the leader now accused of war crimes, it has appeared it is impossible. Authoritarianism does not suffer political competitors and a political field of Georgia it has appeared "smoothed out" not only for Moscow, but also for Washington. Using analogies to authoritative modes on the post-Soviet territory and marking a certain authoritative trend in the politician M.Saakashvili, it is possible to draw a cautious conclusion that if the president of Georgia will manage to reserve support of Washington to its power on while threatens nothing.
2. End of operations in South Ossetia is a certain boundary not only in Russian – the Georgian relations, but also in creation of a new geopolitical reality on the post-Soviet territory. Already from the beginning of 2000th years gradual restoration of political-economical power of Russia objectively and all influenced structure of the mutual relations which have developed in 90th years on open spaces CIS and in Baltic at direct participation of the USA, EU and the NATO more intensively.
3. Georgia for modern Russia has no Strategic value. Russia does not wait for full-scale aggression from outside Transcaucasia. Rendering possibilities through Georgia supports to separatists in the North Caucasus are limited, but exist, so the problem of safety of our southern boundaries long time will remain actual, but not in that degree that Russia to incur certain political and economic obligations concerning Tbilisi. Occupation which will automatically assign to Russia for well-being of the population of Georgia is senseless also.
4. The demand of the Antirussian policy in Transcaucasia where the West is consistently occupied by designing of South Caucasian power transit "corridor" alternative to Russia, to a certain stage will provide preservation for M.Saakashvili roles of "ally" of Washington after defeat in South Ossetia.