1. The scale and many-sidedness of national projects allow to claim their idea goes far beyond the framework of separate, though very big state programs. They represent changes that are and will be influencing socio-economic, psychological, public and ultimately political spheres of the country's development. These results are in no way less important, than achievement of planned goals in all priorities. Rthis is needed to be realized.
2. Implementation of the priority projects resulted in accelerated transition to long-term planning and budgeting that is extremely important for a steady economic development. What is even more important that within budgeting the strategy of effective investments in human personality, in quality of life is going to be logically developed. Addressing the NPP has called for long-term branch and inter-branch strategies necessary for the national economy as a whole. There is another important aspect: implementing the priority national projects brings forth introduction of newest technologies.
3. The priority projects have set a good pace to the systems development of the social sphere industries. That pace ought not to be lost. The year of 2007 starts with 17 "pilot" regional projects in the public health. The leaders in education will also continue to get support. In all Russia's regions innovative schools will become the centers for teachers' vocational training. The problems of initial and high vocational education will be addressed in serious way.
4. The experience the government of all levels got in working 'for the result', cooperation with the business, trade communities, and the society as a whole can and must be used to find solutions to the broad range of economic and social problems. That would provide for the effective common work in the interests of every person.